Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from University of Tennessee v. Elliott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Tennessee v. Elliott Anchor | green | “congress did not intend unreviewed state administrative proceedings to have preclusive effect on title vii claims.” | 30 |
| 2 | Timmons v. Caldera | green | “the court's inquiry is not limited to or constricted by the administrative record” | 3 |
| 3 | Fort Sumner Irrigation District v. Carlsbad Irrigation District | green | “judgment may be rendered in it as if such case had originated in the district court” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.