Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Couch v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Couch v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC. Anchor | green | “failure of the legislature to change the law for a long period of time after judicial construction thereof amounts to legislative approval and ratification of the construction placed upon the statute by the court.” | 8 |
| 2 | Williams Companies v. Dunkelgod | green | “the standard of review applicable to a workers' compensation appeal is that which is in effect when the claim accrues.” | 8 |
| 3 | GRAHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS v. PRIDDY | green | “questions of law are reviewed by a de novo standard under which this court has plenary, non-deferential and independent authority to determine whether lower courts have erred in their legal rulings.” | 7 |
| 4 | PEOPLELINK, LLC. v. BEAR | green | “must show the same deference to the weighing of the evidence by the workers' compensation court as the appellate court would show to a court deciding a case of equitable cognizance.” | 4 |
| 5 | Johnson v. Bryan | green | “relied on the employee for support at the time of his death,” | 4 |
| 6 | Johnson v. Bryan | green | “relied on the employee for support for her and the stepchildren at the time of the employee's death.” | 4 |
| 7 | PEOPLELINK, LLC. v. BEAR | green | “reviewing appellate courts must show the same deference to the weighing of the evidence by the workers' compensation court as the appellate court would show to a court deciding a case of equitable cognizance.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.