Topic: summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party shows… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #10251

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joseph v. Lincare, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Joseph v. Lincare, Inc. Anchor
ca1 · 2021
green “summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party shows that 'there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 17
2 Thompson v. Gold Medal Bakery, Inc.
ca1 · 2021
green “cannot rely on conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, acrimonious invective, or rank speculation.” 7
3 Brown v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
ca10 · 2007
green “a prisoner cannot maintain a due process claim for failure to permit witness testimony if he fails to show that the testimony 'would have affected the outcome of his case.” 3
4 Quinones-Torres v. United States
ca1 · 2007
green “entitled to a default judgment simply because the government did not file an opposition to his habeas petition” 3
5 Whitmore v. Jones
ca10 · 2012
green “the opportunity to present documentary and other evidence has never been extended to require prison officials to gather, review, or preserve evidence that a prisoner may later find helpful” 3
6 Thompson v. Gold Medal Bakery, Inc.
ca1 · 2021
green “relying on conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, acrimonious invective, or rank speculation.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check