Topic #10263

7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Hinckley.

#	Case	Flag	Canonical passage	Citers
1	State v. Hinckley Anchor conn · 1985	green	“such review is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.”	18
2	State v. Hinckley conn · 1985	green	“is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.”	6
3	State v. Hinckley conn · 1985	green	“truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.”	4
4	Pietrorazio v. Santopietro conn · 1981	green	“to provide an opportunity for the trial court to pass upon claims of error which may become the subject of an appeal.”	3
5	Valley v. Fazzina conn · 1982	green	“any manifest injustice amounting to plain error under all the circumstances.”	2
6	Valley v. Fazzina conn · 1982	green	“manifest injustice amounting to plain error under all the circumstances.”	2
7	Valley v. Fazzina conn · 1982	green	“manifest injustice amounting to plain error under all the circumstances.' valley v. fazzina, 187 conn. 423, 428 , 446 a.2d 1068 (1982).”	2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Topic #10263