Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Green.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Green Anchor | green | “the time for filing an appeal can be extended beyond 30 days after the imposition of sentence only if the defendant files a timely post-sentence motion.” | 11 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Dreves | green | “if the trial court does not expressly grant nunc pro tunc relief, the time for filing an appeal is neither tolled nor extended.” | 10 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Dreves | green | “the request for nunc pro tunc relief is separate and distinct from the merits of the underlying post-sentence motion.” | 9 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Dreves | green | “the trial court's resolution of the merits of the late post-sentence motion is no substitute for an order expressly granting nunc pro tunc relief.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.