Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harlan v. Harlan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harlan v. Harlan Anchor | green | “that party must demonstrate that continued operation of the original order would be unfair or improper.” | 15 |
| 2 | Sgarellino v. Hightower | green | “. . . a finding of indirect civil contempt must be established by sufficient proof that is premised upon competent evidence presented to the trial court in accordance with the rules of procedure as in ordinary cases.” | 9 |
| 3 | Hart v. Hart | green | “it is particularly appropriate to base a financial award on earning capacity where there is evidence that the payor has voluntarily quit or avoided obtaining employment in his field.” | 7 |
| 4 | Sanchione v. Sanchione | green | “does not automatically entitle a party to a decrease of an alimony order.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.