Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-Cancel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-Cancel Anchor | green | “multiplying the number of hours productively spent by a reasonable hourly rate to calculate a base figure.” | 11 |
| 2 | Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin | green | “the type of work performed, who performed it, the expertise that it required, and when it was undertaken.” | 11 |
| 3 | Gay Officers Action League v. Puerto Rico | green | “qualifications, experience, and specialized competence.” | 8 |
| 4 | Gay Officers Action League v. Puerto Rico | green | “prevailing rates in the community (taking into account the qualifications, experience, and specialized competence of the attorneys involved).” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.