Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Upson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Upson v. State Anchor | green | “a motion to dismiss tests, inter alia, whether on the face of the record, the court is without jurisdiction.” | 18 |
| 2 | City of Bridgeport v. Debek | green | “the superior court lacks subject matter jurisdiction only if it has no competence to entertain the action before it.” | 10 |
| 3 | Castro v. Viera | green | “to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.” | 5 |
| 4 | Plasil v. Tableman | green | “the motion to dismiss shall be used to assert (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.