Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Banco De Seguros Del Estado v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc. And Mt. McKinley Insurance Company, as Successor of the Gibraltar Casualty Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banco De Seguros Del Estado v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc. And Mt. McKinley Insurance Company, as Successor of the Gibraltar Casualty Company Anchor | green | “barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.” | 13 |
| 2 | Michael E. Wallace, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti v. Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar, Robert Winston, Additional | green | “the second circuit does not recognize manifest disregard of the evidence as proper ground for vacating an arbitrator's award.” | 8 |
| 3 | Nutrition 21, Inc. v. Wertheim | green | “barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.” | 7 |
| 4 | Banco De Seguros Del Estado v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc. And Mt. McKinley Insurance Company, as Successor of the Gibraltar Casualty Company | green | “consistently accorded the narrowest of readings” | 4 |
| 5 | Banco De Seguros Del Estado v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc. And Mt. McKinley Insurance Company, as Successor of the Gibraltar Casualty Company | green | “where an arbitration clause is broad, as here, arbitrators have the discretion to order remedies they determine appropriate, so long as they do not exceed the power granted to them by the contract itself.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.