Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 238 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Illinois Republican Party v. J. B. Pritzker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois Republican Party v. J. B. Pritzker Anchor | green | “the applicant need not show that he definitely will win the case.” | 116 |
| 2 | Robert Westefer v. Michael Neal | green | “must be narrowly drawn, extend no further than necessary to remedy the constitutional violation, and use the least intrusive means to correct the violation of the federal right.” | 77 |
| 3 | Robert Westefer v. Michael Neal | green | “injunctive relief to remedy unconstitutional prison conditions must be narrowly drawn, extend no further than necessary to remedy the constitutional violation, and use the least intrusive means to correct the violation of the federal right.” | 45 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.