Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer Anchor | green | “should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 12 |
| 2 | John Colwell v. Robert Bannister | green | “could result in further significant injury” | 10 |
| 3 | Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer | green | “a preliminary injunction is 'an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 9 |
| 4 | Kelvin Hernandez Roman v. Chad Wolf | green | “where the government is a party to a case in which a preliminary injunction is sought, the balance of the equities and public interest factors merge.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.