Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 1,033 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William G. Iannaccone v. Marie Law.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William G. Iannaccone v. Marie Law Anchor | green | “because pro se means to appear for one's self, a person may not appear on another person's behalf in the other's cause” | 212 |
| 2 | Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA | green | “including (1) whether severance will serve judicial economy; (2) whether prejudice to the parties would be caused by severance; and (3) whether the claims involve different witnesses and evidence.” | 212 |
| 3 | Hecht v. City of New York | green | “courts should be guided by 'considerations of convenience, avoidance of prejudice to the parties, and efficiency” | 206 |
| 4 | United States v. James v. Aquavella and Salmon C. Harvey | green | “look to the logical relationship between the claims and determine 'whether the essential facts of the various claims are so logically connected that considerations of judicial economy and fairness dictate that all the issues be resolved in one lawsuit” | 199 |
| 5 | Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA | green | “the two requirements of rule 20 and additional factors, including (1) whether severance will serve judicial economy; (2) whether prejudice to the parties would be caused by severance; and (3) whether the claims involve different witnesses and evidence.” | 32 |
| 6 | United States v. James v. Aquavella and Salmon C. Harvey | green | “courts look to the logical relationship between the claims and determine 'whether the essential facts of the various claims are so logically connected that considerations of judicial economy and fairness dictate that all the issues be resolved in one lawsuit.” | 29 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.