Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party Anchor | green | “in determining whether a law is facially invalid, we must be careful not to go beyond the statute's facial requirements and speculate about 'hypothetical' or 'imaginary' cases.” | 22 |
| 2 | Acorn and Liz Wolff v. City of Phoenix and the Chief of Police of the City of Phoenix, Defendants | green | “no person shall stand on a street or highway and solicit, or attempt to solicit, employment, business or contributions from the occupants of any vehicle.” | 7 |
| 3 | Boardley v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “dispositive question is not what the forum is called, but what purpose it serves.” | 3 |
| 4 | Oberwetter v. Hilliard | green | “divides government property into three categories for purposes of first amendment analysis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.