Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Owens v. Salvador Godinez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Owens v. Salvador Godinez Anchor | green | “district courts should not allow inmates to flout the rules for joining claims and defendants...or to circumvent the prison litigation reform act's fee requirements by combining multiple lawsuits into a single complaint.” | 19 |
| 2 | UWM Student Association v. Michael Lovell | green | “the federal rules are broad, giving district courts considerable flexibility in managing and structuring civil litigation for fair and efficient resolution of complex disputes.” | 12 |
| 3 | Lee v. Cook County, Ill. | green | “the federal rules are broad, giving district courts considerable flexibility in managing and structuring civil litigation for fair and efficient resolution of complex disputes.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.