Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco Company Anchor | green | “in a multi-state class action, variations in state law may swamp any common issues and defeat predominance.” | 21 |
| 2 | Koh v. Microtek International, Inc. | green | “a movant must establish that both venue and jurisdiction with respect to each defendant is proper in the transferee district.” | 5 |
| 3 | Saval v. Bl Ltd. | green | “a district court possesses broad discretion in ruling on a requested severance under rule 21.” | 3 |
| 4 | China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh | green | “if the class mechanism is not a viable option for the claims, the decision denying certification will be made at the outset of the case, litigated once for all would- be class representatives.” | 3 |
| 5 | Rapp v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC | green | “but the laws of the 50 states vary as to the admissibility of extrinsic evidence-sometimes drastically so.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.