Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “a reviewing court must uphold the disability determination when an alj has applied correct legal standards and the alj's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 25 |
| 2 | Ketcher v. Apfel | green | “is only triggered if there is ample evidence in the record to support a determination that the claimant's impairment meets or equals one of the listed impairments.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ketcher v. Apfel | green | “under cook, the duty of identification of relevant listed impairments and comparison of symptoms to listing criteria is only triggered if there is ample evidence in the record to support a determination that the claimant's impairment meets or equals one of the listed impairments.” | 4 |
| 4 | Schoofield v. Barnhart | green | “where it is clear from the record which listing . . . was considered, and there is elsewhere in the alj's opinion an equivalent discussion of the medical evidence relevant to the step three analysis which allows the reviewing court readily to determine whether there was substant…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.