Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC. Anchor | green | “we take the facts from the record that was before the trial court . . . . ' "we review the trial court's decision de novo, considering all the evidence set forth in the moving and opposing papers except that to which objections were made and sustained.” | 18 |
| 2 | Perry v. Bakewell Hawthorne, LLC | green | “all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 15 |
| 3 | Perry v. Bakewell Hawthorne, LLC | green | “shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.