Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Anchor | green | “the burden of proving that a contract term is unconscionable rests with the party attacking the contract.” | 8 |
| 2 | Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC | green | “arbitration is a matter of contract.” | 8 |
| 3 | Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp. | green | “procedural unconscionability is concerned with inequities, improprieties, or unfairness in the bargaining process and formation of the contract.” | 5 |
| 4 | Hampden Coal, LLC and Oliver Hunt v. Michael R. Varney | green | “a mutual agreement to arbitrate is sufficient consideration to support an arbitration agreement,” | 3 |
| 5 | Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. | green | “allegedly inconsistent conduct in a separate case involving a different party can waive the right to arbitrate.” | 3 |
| 6 | Myers v. Carnahan | green | “a subsequent contract which does not by express terms abrogate an earlier contract nevertheless will operate as a discharge thereof, if it is inconsistent with such earlier contract.” | 3 |
| 7 | Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp. | green | “include, but are not limited to, the age, literacy, or lack of sophistication of a party; hidden or unduly complex contract terms; the adhesive nature of the contract; and the manner and setting in which the contract was formed, including whether each party had a reasonable oppo…” | 3 |
| 8 | Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp. | green | “is not in itself sufficient evidence that an arbitration agreement is grossly unfair and thus unenforceable on grounds of procedural unconscionability.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.