Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kevin Wanjiru v. Eric Holder, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kevin Wanjiru v. Eric Holder, Jr. Anchor | green | “confirmed charges (a step similar to finding probable cause)” | 6 |
| 2 | SILVA-TREVINO | green | “encompasses both conduct that involves moral turpitude and conduct that does not.” | 5 |
| 3 | Ji Cheng Ni v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. | green | “mate rial and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented” | 4 |
| 4 | Fredy Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr. | green | “if it appears that the government in question would apply its criminal statute to reach both turpitudinous and nonturpi tudinous acts-perhaps because the statute is divisible, but also because the statute could realistically cover a wide range of conduct.” | 4 |
| 5 | Martin Mendoza-Sanchez v. Loretta Lynch | green | “kidnapping, extorting, and provid ing protection for, or acting directly on behalf of, organized crime and drug traffickers.” | 4 |
| 6 | Ulises Martinez Lopez v. Loretta E. Lynch | green | “cat protection requires evidence that the petitioner will be tortured by the government, or with the government's ac quiescence.” | 4 |
| 7 | Ulises Martinez Lopez v. Loretta E. Lynch | green | “the public official, prior to the activity constituting torture, had awareness of such activity and thereafter breached his or her legal responsibility to inter vene to prevent such activity.” | 4 |
| 8 | SILVA-TREVINO | green | “any evidence, otherwise admissible in removal pro ceedings.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.