Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc. Anchor | green | “has a fair chance of success on the merits.” | 12 |
| 2 | Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc. | green | “fair chance of success on the merits.” | 10 |
| 3 | Kenneth W. Benda v. Grand Lodge Of The International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers | green | “extremes of a single continuum,” | 6 |
| 4 | Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California Corporation | green | “either a likelihood of success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury, or that serious questions going to the merits were raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in its favor.” | 4 |
| 5 | State of Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie | green | “likelihood of success analysis” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.