Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd. Anchor | green | “an ambiguity does not arise simply because the parties advance conflicting interpretations of the contract.” | 20 |
| 2 | Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. Cernosek | green | “we give the language its plain, grammatical meaning unless doing so would clearly defeat the parties' intentions.” | 6 |
| 3 | Trevor Rees-Jones, Trustee for Atkins Petroleum Corp. v. Trevor Rees-Jones, Trustee for Apache Services, Inc. | green | “that arise out of or relate to the facts and circumstances made the basis of the adversary proceeding, or that were or could have been asserted in the adversary proceeding and/or the proofs of claim.” | 3 |
| 4 | Trevor Rees-Jones, Trustee for Atkins Petroleum Corp. v. Trevor Rees-Jones, Trustee for Apache Services, Inc. | green | “that payment of the new amount will amount to full satisfaction of the existing claim.” | 3 |
| 5 | Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. v. Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C. (In Re Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C.) | green | “by another contract to which they are not privy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.