Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cheryl D. Christopher v. Adam's Mark Hotels, a Division of Hbe Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cheryl D. Christopher v. Adam's Mark Hotels, a Division of Hbe Corporation Anchor | green | “cannot and should not be construed to exempt” | 16 |
| 2 | Michael Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., a Missouri Corporation in Good Standing, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus Curiae | green | “where the unresolved issues are primarily legal rather than factual, summary judgment is particularly appropriate.” | 14 |
| 3 | Teachout v. Forest City Community School District | green | “(1) engagement in a protected activity, (2) adverse employment action, and (3) a causal connection between the two.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.