Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shan Sheng Zhao v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shan Sheng Zhao v. Holder Anchor | green | “when the bia adopts the ij's reasoning and supplements the ij's opinion, that opinion, as supplemented by the bia, becomes the basis for review.” | 14 |
| 2 | Shan Sheng Zhao v. Holder | green | “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” | 7 |
| 3 | Faustino Santana-Albarran v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “specifically divests jurisdiction of a court to review judgments regarding the granting of discretionary relief, including the cancellation of removal” | 4 |
| 4 | Kaba v. Mukasey | green | “rather, to overturn such a factual determination, 'we must find that the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion, but compels it.” | 4 |
| 5 | Faustino Santana-Albarran v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “exceptional and extremely unusual” | 3 |
| 6 | Bi Qing Zheng v. Loretta Lynch | green | “led to a substantially different outcome from that which would have occurred in the absence of those violations,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.