Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Lott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Lott Anchor | green | “the law favors joining multiple offenses in a single trial under crim.r. 8(a) if the offenses charged 'are of the same or similar character.” | 14 |
| 2 | State v. Lowe | green | “to be admissible to prove identity through a certain modus operandi, other-acts evidence must be related to and share common features with the crime in question.” | 10 |
| 3 | State v. Johnson | green | “if the state can meet the joinder test, it need not meet the stricter 'other acts' test.” | 8 |
| 4 | State v. Kaufman | green | “the joinder test only requires that the evidence of each joined offense is simple and distinct and ensures that a jury would be capable of segregating the proof required for each offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.