Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Connell v. Francisco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connell v. Francisco Anchor | green | “stable, marital-like relationship where both parties cohabit with knowledge that a lawful marriage between them does not exist.” | 15 |
| 2 | Connell v. Francisco | green | “continuous cohabitation, duration of the relationship, purpose of the relationship, pooling of resources and services for joint projects, and the intent of the parties.” | 10 |
| 3 | Connell v. Francisco | green | “is a stable, marital-like relationship where both parties cohabit with knowledge that a lawful marriage between them does not exist.” | 8 |
| 4 | In re the Meretricious Relationship of Long | green | “our supreme court has noted 'meretricious' carries negative and derogatory connotations and has chosen to substitute 'committed intimate relationship' for meretricious relationship.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.