Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 233 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof Ssa.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof Ssa Anchor | green | “the alj must specifically identify the testimony she or he finds not to be credible and must explain what evidence undermines the testimony.” | 132 |
| 2 | Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “an alj does not provide specific, clear, and convincing reasons for rejecting a claimant's testimony by simply reciting the medical evidence in support of his or her residual functional capacity determination.” | 101 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.