Topic: clearly established federal law' means the holdings, not th… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1092

7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Owen v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Owen v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections Anchor
ca11 · 2009
green “clearly established federal law' means the holdings, not the dicta, of the united states supreme court.” 5
2 Ford v. Wainwright
scotus · 1986
green “in no other circumstance of which we are aware is the vindication of a constitutional right entrusted to the unreviewable discretion of an administrative tribunal.” 5
3 Darick Demorris Walker v. William Page True, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, the Arc of Virginia, Amicus Supporting
ca4 · 2005
green “while walker's claim ultimately derives from his rights under the eighth amendment, whether he is mentally retarded is governed by virginia law.” 4
4 Holladay v. Allen
ca11 · 2009
green “he court left to the states the development of standards for determining when an offender is mentally retarded.” 3
5 King v. State
ga · 2000
green “jury should not be informed that a finding of mental retardation bars the imposition of the death penalty.” 3
6 Heidler v. State
ga · 2000
green “n the guilt-innocence phase, the trial court should not inform the jury that the defendant will not receive a death sentence if he is found guilty but mentally retarded.” 3
7 Stripling v. State
ga · 2011
green “we have previously addressed this very issue, and we now reiterate our prior holding that georgia's beyond a reasonable doubt standard is not unconstitutional.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check