Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. James P. Hornaday.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. James P. Hornaday Anchor | green | “speech attempting to arrange the sexual abuse of children is no more constitutionally protected than speech attempting to arrange any other type of crime.” | 12 |
| 2 | Lo, Ex Parte John Christopher | green | “it is the conduct of requesting a minor to engage in illegal sexual acts that is the gravamen of the offense.” | 12 |
| 3 | State v. Rung | green | “various state courts considering statutes similar to 28-320.02 have also rejected first amendment challenges on the basis that speech to entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity is not speech protected by the first amendment” | 3 |
| 4 | Karwoski v. State | green | “speech attempting to arrange the sexual abuse of children is no more constitutionally protected than speech attempting to arrange any other type of crime” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.