Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc. Anchor | green | “must result from a meeting of the minds of the parties in mutual assent to the terms, must be based upon a sufficient consideration, free from fraud or undue influence, not against public policy and sufficiently definite to be enforced.” | 19 |
| 2 | Jamestowne on Signal, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n | green | “may prevent the creation of an enforceable contract.” | 8 |
| 3 | Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-677 | green | “the terms of a contract are reasonably certain if they provide a basis for determining the existence of a breach and for giving an appropriate remedy.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.