Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maynard v. Cartwright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maynard v. Cartwright Anchor | green | “vagueness challenges to statutes not threatening first amendment interests are examined in light of the facts of the case at hand; the statute is judged on an as-applied basis.” | 31 |
| 2 | United States v. Jerry Schneiderman, Jerry Ranallo, Larry Butler and Insertion Advertising Corp. | green | “the court must first determine whether the statute 'gives the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited' and then consider whether the law 'provides explicit standards for those who apply it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.