Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stein.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stein Anchor | green | “commensurate with the nature and gravity of the violations and the intent with which they were committed.” | 16 |
| 2 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Paul | green | “consider the nature of the ethical duties violated in light of any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.” | 6 |
| 3 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Nichols | green | “it is well settled that our obligation in disciplinary matters is to protect the public and maintain the public's confidence in the legal system rather than to punish the attorney for misconduct.” | 4 |
| 4 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Greenleaf | green | “to protect the public and the public's confidence in the legal profession.” | 4 |
| 5 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thomas | green | “the court gives deference to the hearing judge's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.” | 3 |
| 6 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bell | green | “we deem the hearing judge's findings of fact 'correct if (1) they are not clearly erroneous, or (2), at the court's option, if neither party filed exceptions to them.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.