Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of L.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of L.A. Anchor | green | “where the trial court has independently reviewed an administrative agency's factual findings, an appellate court applies the substantial evidence test to the findings of the trial court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. | green | “do not have precedential value” | 5 |
| 3 | Metropolitan Water District v. Superior Court | green | “it may exclude from enrollment workers, such as plaintiffs, who are paid through private labor suppliers, even if they would be employees under the common law test.” | 5 |
| 4 | Metropolitan Water District v. Superior Court | green | “membership in calpers is compulsory for all employees.” | 5 |
| 5 | Metropolitan Water District v. Superior Court | green | “share or allocate between them certain responsibilities of employment.” | 5 |
| 6 | Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc. | green | “if the employer has the authority to exercise . . . control, whether or not that right is exercised with respect to all details, an employer-employee relationship exists.” | 5 |
| 7 | Molina v. Board of Administration | green | “the judgment will be upheld if there is any substantial evidence in support of each of the trial court's essential findings; all contrary evidence will be disregarded on appeal.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.