Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 231 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sykes v. Bank of America.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sykes v. Bank of America Anchor | green | “construe his complaint liberally and interpret it to raise the strongest arguments that it suggests.” | 93 |
| 2 | Daniel v. T & M Protection Resources, Inc. | green | “draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” | 61 |
| 3 | Bell v. Jendell | green | “the liberal treatment afforded to pro se litigants does not exempt a pro se party from compliance with relevant rules of procedure and substantive law.” | 41 |
| 4 | Joseph v. Treglia v. Town of Manlius | green | “a plaintiff's burden at this prima facie stage is de minimis.” | 27 |
| 5 | Cox v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Department | green | “the employee at all times bears the burden of persuasion to show retaliatory motive.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.