Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bullock v. Carter.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bullock v. Carter Anchor | green | “in approaching candidate restrictions, it is essential to examine in a realistic light the extent and nature of their impact on voters.” | 19 |
| 2 | Storer v. Brown | green | “past experience will be a helpful, if not always an unerring, guide: it will be one thing if independent candidates have qualified with some regularity and quite a different matter if they have not.” | 8 |
| 3 | Lubin v. Panish | green | “availability of political opportunity.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.