Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Briggs Ex Rel. Briggs v. Massanari.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Briggs Ex Rel. Briggs v. Massanari Anchor | green | “although the alj need not discuss all of the evidence in the record, he may not ignore evidence that does not support his decision, especially when that evidence is 'significantly probative.” | 26 |
| 2 | Brown v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “when the alj has failed to comply with ssr 96-8p because he has not linked his rfc determination with specific evidence in the record, the court cannot adequately assess whether relevant evidence supports the alj's rfc determination.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.