Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Coble v. City of White House, Tenn..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coble v. City of White House, Tenn. Anchor | green | “facts that are not blatantly contradicted by the evidence remain entitled to an interpretation most favorable to the non-moving party.” | 19 |
| 2 | Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. State of Tennessee, Renata E. Bluhm, M.D. And Occupatient Medical Services, P.C. | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.