Topic: is so poorly articulated as to prevent meaningful review. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #11136

5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kathleen EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Kathleen EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee Anchor
ca7 · 1993
green “is so poorly articulated as to prevent meaningful review.” 13
2 Richard GLENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
ca7 · 1987
green “when an applicant for social security benefits is represented by counsel the administrative law judge is entitled to assume that the applicant is making his strongest case for benefits.” 6
3 Richard Haynes v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
ca7 · 2005
green “the weight properly to be given to testimony or other evidence of a treating physician depends on circumstances.” 6
4 Nancy Prochaska v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
ca7 · 2006
green “credibility determinations can rarely be disturbed by a reviewing court, lacking as it does the opportunity to observe the claimant testifying.” 5
5 Richard GLENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
ca7 · 1987
green “the alj is entitled to assume that a claimant represented by counsel 'is making his strongest case for benefits.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check