Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chlopek v. Federal Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chlopek v. Federal Insurance Anchor | green | “one of these criteria is met, the district court may order bifurcation as long as doing so will not prejudice the non-moving party or violate the seventh amendment.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Michael Chaparro | green | “limiting instructions cure everything,” | 7 |
| 3 | Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp. | green | “committed to the discretion of the district court” | 7 |
| 4 | Chlopek v. Federal Insurance | green | “one of rule 42(b)'s criteria is met, the district court may order bifurcation . . . .” | 5 |
| 5 | Andrew Dollard v. Gary Whisenand | green | “the concept of guilt by association is repugnant to our notion of elemental justice and fair play.” | 5 |
| 6 | Rashad Swanigan v. City of Chicago | green | “a verdict in favor of individual defendants would not necessarily be inconsistent with a plaintiff's verdict on a factually distinct monell claim.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.