Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jason Dickerson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason Dickerson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Anchor | green | “(1) whether the remarks tended to mislead the jury or to prejudice the accused; (2) whether they were isolated or extensive; (3) whether they were deliberately or accidentally placed before the jury; and (4) the strength of the evidence against the accused.” | 16 |
| 2 | Brewer v. Commonwealth | green | “easily perceptible, plain, obvious, and readily noticeable.” | 10 |
| 3 | Timmons v. Commonwealth | green | “that which a jury may reasonably believe to have been probable is enough to support a finding of guilt.” | 4 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Goss | green | “it is clear that a different result would occur, since a defendant convicted on insufficient proof should be acquitted.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.