Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Zoltek Corp. v. Structural Polymer Group.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zoltek Corp. v. Structural Polymer Group Anchor | green | “draw on its judicial experience and common sense,” | 23 |
| 2 | Ricky Tatum v. Willie Robinson | green | “even when officers are justified in using some force, they violate the suspects' fourth amendment rights if they use unreasonable amounts of force.” | 6 |
| 3 | James Keith Bauer and Mary Ellen Bauer v. Mark Norris, Individually and as Deputy of the McCook County Sheriff's Office, South Dakota, Mark England | green | “the use of force by officers simply because a suspect is argumentative, contentious, or vituperative is not to be condoned.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.