Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matter of CA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matter of CA Anchor | green | “to protect the community from the dangers of recidivism by sexual offenders.” | 13 |
| 2 | Doe v. Poritz | green | “the law is remedial and not intended to be punitive.” | 8 |
| 3 | Matter of CA | green | “hearing process . . . is not governed by the rules of evidence.” | 5 |
| 4 | Matter of CA | green | “the first two categories, 'seriousness of offense' and 'offense history,' are considered static categories because they relate to the registrant's prior criminal conduct.” | 4 |
| 5 | In Re TT | green | “an rras score totaling 0 to 36 is low risk; 37 to 73 moderate risk; and 74 or more, high risk.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.