Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema Corporation Anchor | green | “(1) the order the contemnor failed to comply with is clear and unambiguous, (2) the proof of noncompliance is clear and convincing, and (3) the contemnor has not diligently attempted to comply in a reasonable manner.” | 18 |
| 2 | Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema Corporation | green | “a contempt order is warranted only where the moving party establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated the district court's edict.” | 6 |
| 3 | Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema Corporation | green | “a movant must establish that (1) the order the contemnor failed to comply with is clear and unambiguous, (2) the proof of noncompliance is clear and convincing, and (3) the contemnor has not diligently attempted to comply in a reasonable manner.” | 5 |
| 4 | Levin v. Tiber Holding Corp. | green | “in the context of civil contempt, the clear and convincing standard requires a quantum of proof adequate to demonstrate a reasonable certainty that a violation occurred.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.