Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Flanagan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Flanagan Anchor | green | “the pcra timeliness requirements are jurisdictional in nature and, accordingly, a court cannot hear untimely pcra petitions.” | 19 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Wilson | green | “since appellant's pcra petition is untimely, our review focuses on whether appellant has pled and proven that one of the three limited exceptions to the timeliness requirements of the pcra apply.” | 8 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Pursell | green | “the courts have no jurisdiction to grant him relief unless he can plead and prove that one of the exceptions to the time bar provided in 42 pa.cons.stat.ann. 9545(b)(1)(i)-(iii) applies.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.