Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. McDowell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. McDowell Anchor | green | “the trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to admit or exclude expert testimony , and its decision as to whether expert testimony meets the standard for admissibility is subject to review for abuse of discretion.” | 11 |
| 2 | People v. Johnson | green | “in assessing claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we consider whether counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms and whether the defendant suffered prejudice to a reasonable probability, that is, …” | 7 |
| 3 | People v. Mitchell | green | “a claim of instructional error is reviewed de novo.” | 7 |
| 4 | People v. McDowell | green | “when expert opinion is offered, much must be left to the trial court's discretion.' the trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to admit or exclude expert testimony , and its decision as to whether expert testimony meets the standard for admissibility is subject to …” | 6 |
| 5 | People v. Peterson | green | “any such objection would have been meritless and properly overruled” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.