Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from King v. King.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King v. King Anchor | green | “the division of the estate is not rendered inequitable simply because it is not mathematically equal, or because each party did not receive a share of every item of marital property.” | 12 |
| 2 | Aaron v. Aaron | green | “while there is no absolute formula for determining the amount of alimony, 'the real need of the spouse seeking the support is the single most important factor.” | 7 |
| 3 | Cranford v. Cranford | green | “in addition to the need of the disadvantaged spouse, the courts most often consider the ability of the obligor spouse to provide support.” | 6 |
| 4 | Cranford v. Cranford | green | “is the single most important factor.” | 5 |
| 5 | Gilliam v. Gilliam | green | “where the evidence preponderates against the award, and a manifest injustice will be done” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.