Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Rodriguez Anchor | green | “the primary purpose or object of an appearance bond is to secure the presence of a defendant in court for the trial of the offense charged.” | 17 |
| 2 | Balboa v. State | green | “presumption of innocence of the accused and the compelling interest of the state that the accused appear to answer the accusation against him.” | 10 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Scott | green | “merely one factor to be considered in determining the appropriate amount of bond.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.