Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Escobar-Urrego.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Escobar-Urrego Anchor | green | “under the law-of-the-case doctrine, an issue decided at one stage of a case is binding at later stages of the same case.” | 14 |
| 2 | United States v. Escobar-Urrego | green | “under the law of the case doctrine, a legal decision made at one stage of the litigation, unchallenged in a subsequent appeal when the opportunity existed, becomes the law of the case for future stages of the same litigation, and the parties are deemed to have waived the right t…” | 9 |
| 3 | United States v. Escobar-Urrego | green | “a legal decision made at one stage of the litigation, unchallenged in a subsequent appeal when the opportunity existed, becomes the law of the case for future stages of the same litigation, and the parties are deemed to have waived the right to challenge that decision at a later…” | 7 |
| 4 | Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Garcia | green | “courts are forbidden, however from engaging in any such rewriting process, even in the guise of 'interpreting' an insurance policy against the company.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.