Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. Anchor | green | “a cause of action for civil conspiracy exists only if one of the parties to the agreement commits some act in furtherance of the agreement, which is itself a tort.” | 11 |
| 2 | McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. | green | “a combination of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means.” | 8 |
| 3 | Robin Willie Turner v. Hirschbach Motor Lines | green | “under illinois tort law, a civil conspiracy requires '(1) an agreement between two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means; and (2) at least one tortious act by one of the co-conspirators in furtherance of…” | 6 |
| 4 | Thermodyne Food Service Products, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp. | green | “a conspiracy claim alleging a tort as the underlying wrongful act is duplicative where the underlying tort has been pled.” | 3 |
| 5 | Charles Greenhill v. Richard Vartanian | green | “illinois starts the period of limitations no later than actual discovery, even if the potential defendant tried unsuccessfully to conceal the offense.” | 3 |
| 6 | Doctor's Data, Inc. v. Barrett | green | “because a successful conspiracy claim enables a plaintiff to hold co-conspirators jointly liable for actions by other members of the conspiracy, a conspiracy claim is only actionable if it is based on new facts or seeks to extend liability for the underlying tort to new defendan…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.