Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Hill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Hill Anchor | green | “begins with the text of the provision and the plain meaning of the words in the text.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M. | green | “as part of the guidelines themselves, and not mere commentary on them.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Eric James Thornton, Jr., AKA Seal B | green | “although ... the state did not need to prove that his driving was impaired to convict him,” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Eric James Thornton, Jr., AKA Seal B | green | “falls squarely within the language of” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Albright | green | “a 'first' violation of 346.63(1) is not a criminal act” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. Eric James Thornton, Jr., AKA Seal B | green | “because we hold that thornton's prior conviction is 'similar' to a conviction for driving under the influence, the district court did not need to find that no. 182548 7 thornton's driving was impaired ... in order to include that offense in calculating his criminal history score.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.