Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Caroline Herron v. Fannie Mae.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caroline Herron v. Fannie Mae Anchor | green | “a rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of a plaintiff's complaint; it does not require a court to 'assess the truth of what is asserted or determine whether a plaintiff has any evidence to back up what is in the complaint.” | 30 |
| 2 | Houshang Momenian v. Michael Davidson | green | “a complaint will be dismissed under rule 12(b)(6) as 'conclusively time-barred' if 'a trial court determines that the allegations of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.