Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kordasiewicz v. Erie County Department of Social Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kordasiewicz v. Erie County Department of Social Services Anchor | green | “it is well established that our review is limited to whether the determination to deny the request to amend and seal the indicated report is supported by substantial evidence in the record” | 6 |
| 2 | Kordasiewicz v. Erie County Department of Social Services | green | “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” | 6 |
| 3 | Jeannette LL. v. Johnson | green | “conflicting versions of events create credibility issues, it is respondent's responsibility to resolve them, and that assessment will not be disturbed as long as it is supported by substantial evidence” | 3 |
| 4 | Mary P. v. Helfer | green | “because the girls were so uncomfortable with petitioner's boyfriend being in the home or being around,” | 3 |
| 5 | Pitts v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services | neutral | “is not within this court's discretion to weigh conflicting testimony or substitute its own judgment for that of the administrative finder of fact” | 3 |
| 6 | Danielle G. v. Schauseil | green | “cannot substitute our own judgment for that of the administrative agency, even if a contrary result is viable” | 3 |
| 7 | Dawn M. v. New York State Central Register of Child Abuse & Maltreatment | green | “it is well established that our review is limited to whether the determination to deny the request to amend and seal the indicated report is supported by substantial evidence in the record” | 3 |
| 8 | Dawn M. v. New York State Central Register of Child Abuse & Maltreatment | green | “substantial evidence is such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact . . . , and hearsay evidence alone, if it is sufficiently reliable and probative, may constitute sufficient evidence to support a determination” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.